Retina Gallery ~ Full Sized Retina Images

Library of Free, Non-Copyrighted Retina Images and Videos

Choose your language:



62-year-old man was fine until about a year ago when he noticed decreasing vision in the right eye. There was fluid in the macula in both eyes; not in the center of the macula in the left but nasally and in the center of the macula in the right eye. He had one treatment with Avastin in the right eye on January 7th, which did not particularly help. He also had a trial of eplerenone at a dose of 50 mg PO Q day x 6 weeks without any effect either. . He does not take any steroids and is not taking any phosphodiesterase inhibitors and his blood pressure is reasonable. VISUAL ACUITY: Vision OD is 20/100, OS is 20/20. IOP: OD 12, OS 13. SLIT LAMP EXAM: There is 1+ nuclear sclerosis in both eyes. EXTENDED OPHTHALMOSCOPY: OD: Vertical C/D ratio is 0.2. There are pigment irregularities centrally. OS: Vertical C/D ratio is 0.2. There is no posterior vitreous separation. There are some peripapillary pigment irregularities. SPECTRALIS SD-OCT SCAN: The OCT scan of the right eye does show trace subretinal fluid overlying an area of thickening, which looks to be subretinal and possibly neovascular, in the center of the macula. The choroidal thickness under the center of the fovea is 400 microns. The left eye OCT scan shows a normal central foveal thickness in the retina. There is, however, serous macular detachment nasal to the fovea. In the superotemporal optic nerve, there does appear to be some subretinal areas which look to possibly be neovascular. The choroidal thickness under the center of the fovea in the left eye is 384 microns. (NOTE: Retinal thickness measured with Spectralis OCT is approximately 70 µm greater than that measured with Stratus OCT. This increased measurement corresponds to the inclusion of the outer segment-RPE-Bruch's membrane complex by Spectralis OCT.) FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPHY – AUTOFLUORESCENCE: Autofluorescence image in the right eye shows hypoautofluorescence inferior to the fovea from chronic subretinal fluid. Centrally though, there is hypoautofluorescence, but it is not too dark in the center of the macula. In the left eye, the autofluorescence image is nearly normal with just a little bit hyperautofluorescence in the area of the pigment epithelial thickening adjacent to the optic nerve at about 1:00 o’clock, about a disc diameter off the nerve. FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY: FA of the right eye shows early hypofluorescence with fairly brisk hyperfluorescence inferior to the fovea, which looks to be from devitalization of the pigment epithelium. In the late frames, there is no pinpoint hyperfluorescence on the fluorescein angiogram, just sort of diffuse leakage as you would expect and an occult subfoveal choroidal neovascular membrane. The FA of the left eye shows some hyperfluorescence adjacent to the optic nerve, but again nothing pinpoint and nothing extreme as you would expect in an occult subretinal choroidal neovascular membrane. INDOCYANINE GREEN ANGIOGRAM: The right eye shows some hyperfluorescence at four minutes in the center of the macula, and then in the later images, there is a poorly defined area of hyperfluorescence centrally, measuring about 3mm² which does involve the center of the fovea. The indocyanine green angiogram of the left eye shows, within the first five minutes, some hyperfluorescence adjacent to the optic nerve just superotemporal to the nerve. In the later frames, that area does light up a little bit. IMPRESSION: 1. SEROUS RETINAL DETACHMENT – BOTH EYES 2. POSSIBLE WET AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION – BOTH EYES 3. POSSIBLE CENTRAL SEROUS RETINOPATHY – BOTH EYES 4. PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT – BOTH EYES DISCUSSION: I explained to the patient given the subretinal deposits in both eyes and the minimal choroidal thickness on the indocyanine and fluorescein appearance of the retina, this looks a little more like wet macular degeneration than central serous retinopathy. I suggested, prior to contemplating photodynamic laser, he have a series of monthly intravitreal injections for six months in both eyes. I think that will probably dry up the left eye and may dry up the right eye a little bit. If Avastin and Lucentis do not work in the right eye, Eylea could also be tried. If all that fails, it would not be unreasonable to consider photodynamic laser.

serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_01.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Color Photo109 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_02.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Color Photo72 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_03.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Color Photo58 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_04.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Color Photo68 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_05.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Color Photo82 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_06.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Color Photo84 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_07.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - IR71 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_08.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - IR71 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_09.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - FAF204 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_10.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - FAF75 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_11.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - FAF85 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_12.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - FAF91 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_13.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - SD - OCT104 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_14.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - SD - OCT131 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_15.avi
VIDEO TAKES TIME TO LOADSerous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - SD - OCT93 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_16.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - SD - OCT108 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_17.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - SD - OCT93 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_18.avi
VIDEO TAKES TIME TO LOAD Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - SD - OCT91 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_19.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram50 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_20.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram56 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_21.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram86 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_22.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram55 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_23.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram96 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_24.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram63 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_25.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram66 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_26.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram47 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_27.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram83 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_28.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man - Fluorescein angiogram56 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_29.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man ICG52 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_30.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man ICG55 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_31.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man ICG72 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_32.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man ICG 96 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_33.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man ICG84 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_34.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man ICG47 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_35.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man ICG63 views00000
(0 votes)
serousrd_Valoss_rimo_030113_36.jpg
Serous Macular Detachment Both Eyes - Wet AMD vs. CSR - 62 Year Old Man ICG82 views00000
(0 votes)
36 files on 1 page(s)

62-year-old man was fine until about a year ago when he noticed decreasing vision in the right eye. There was fluid in the macula in both eyes; not in the center of the macula in the left but nasally and in the center of the macula in the right eye. He had one treatment with Avastin in the right eye on January 7th, which did not particularly help. He also had a trial of eplerenone at a dose of 50 mg PO Q day x 6 weeks without any effect either. . He does not take any steroids and is not taking any phosphodiesterase inhibitors and his blood pressure is reasonable. VISUAL ACUITY: Vision OD is 20/100, OS is 20/20. IOP: OD 12, OS 13. SLIT LAMP EXAM: There is 1+ nuclear sclerosis in both eyes. EXTENDED OPHTHALMOSCOPY: OD: Vertical C/D ratio is 0.2. There are pigment irregularities centrally. OS: Vertical C/D ratio is 0.2. There is no posterior vitreous separation. There are some peripapillary pigment irregularities. SPECTRALIS SD-OCT SCAN: The OCT scan of the right eye does show trace subretinal fluid overlying an area of thickening, which looks to be subretinal and possibly neovascular, in the center of the macula. The choroidal thickness under the center of the fovea is 400 microns. The left eye OCT scan shows a normal central foveal thickness in the retina. There is, however, serous macular detachment nasal to the fovea. In the superotemporal optic nerve, there does appear to be some subretinal areas which look to possibly be neovascular. The choroidal thickness under the center of the fovea in the left eye is 384 microns. (NOTE: Retinal thickness measured with Spectralis OCT is approximately 70 µm greater than that measured with Stratus OCT. This increased measurement corresponds to the inclusion of the outer segment-RPE-Bruch's membrane complex by Spectralis OCT.) FUNDUS PHOTOGRAPHY – AUTOFLUORESCENCE: Autofluorescence image in the right eye shows hypoautofluorescence inferior to the fovea from chronic subretinal fluid. Centrally though, there is hypoautofluorescence, but it is not too dark in the center of the macula. In the left eye, the autofluorescence image is nearly normal with just a little bit hyperautofluorescence in the area of the pigment epithelial thickening adjacent to the optic nerve at about 1:00 o’clock, about a disc diameter off the nerve. FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY: FA of the right eye shows early hypofluorescence with fairly brisk hyperfluorescence inferior to the fovea, which looks to be from devitalization of the pigment epithelium. In the late frames, there is no pinpoint hyperfluorescence on the fluorescein angiogram, just sort of diffuse leakage as you would expect and an occult subfoveal choroidal neovascular membrane. The FA of the left eye shows some hyperfluorescence adjacent to the optic nerve, but again nothing pinpoint and nothing extreme as you would expect in an occult subretinal choroidal neovascular membrane. INDOCYANINE GREEN ANGIOGRAM: The right eye shows some hyperfluorescence at four minutes in the center of the macula, and then in the later images, there is a poorly defined area of hyperfluorescence centrally, measuring about 3mm² which does involve the center of the fovea. The indocyanine green angiogram of the left eye shows, within the first five minutes, some hyperfluorescence adjacent to the optic nerve just superotemporal to the nerve. In the later frames, that area does light up a little bit. IMPRESSION: 1. SEROUS RETINAL DETACHMENT – BOTH EYES 2. POSSIBLE WET AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION – BOTH EYES 3. POSSIBLE CENTRAL SEROUS RETINOPATHY – BOTH EYES 4. PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT – BOTH EYES DISCUSSION: I explained to the patient given the subretinal deposits in both eyes and the minimal choroidal thickness on the indocyanine and fluorescein appearance of the retina, this looks a little more like wet macular degeneration than central serous retinopathy. I suggested, prior to contemplating photodynamic laser, he have a series of monthly intravitreal injections for six months in both eyes. I think that will probably dry up the left eye and may dry up the right eye a little bit. If Avastin and Lucentis do not work in the right eye, Eylea could also be tried. If all that fails, it would not be unreasonable to consider photodynamic laser.